Clinical Trial

Effect of Mechanical Ventilation on Radiofrequency Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation

Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated January 24, 2025 (before its estimated July 1, 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is performed under general anesthesia. The success of the procedure depends on the safe contact of the catheter electrode with the myocardium. Movement of the catheter tip due to respiratory changes can result in inadequate lesion formation and AF recurrence. The success of AF ablation depends on the adequacy of energy delivered to the myocardium and the durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Poor energy delivery and tissue heating during ablation are a major cause of procedural failure in RFA. To improve the success of the PVI procedure, efforts are underway to optimize catheter stability and contact force. However, catheter force and stability are influenced by respiration-induced thoracic motion, highlighting the importance of controlled breathing for further optimization. Fluoroscopy and ablation times during electroanatomic mapping-guided AF ablations improved with controlled mechanical ventilation. General anesthesia improved catheter contact. Low tidal volume, high respiratory rate (FCV), pressure controlled mechanical ventilation (PCV), volume controlled mechanical ventilation (VCV), pressure controlled volume assured mechanical ventilation (PRVC) can be used in investigators' hospital. The literature offers no definitive proof that one ablation procedure is superior to another.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06791915
Lead Sponsor Kocaeli City Hospital
Conditions Radiofrequency Ablation, Atrial Fibrillation, Mechanical Ventilation
Enrollment 50 participants
Start Date 2025-01-01
Primary Completion 2025-07-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2025-08-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-01-24