Comparison of 6F and 7F Sheaths for Coronary Intervention Via Distal Radial Artery Access

StatusUnknown
PhaseNot applicable
Started

Record status This record was last updated February 25, 2025 (before its estimated September 30, 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.

Free. We email you which fields changed when ClinicalTrials.gov updates this record.

Track this trial
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

  1. Changed Registry marked status Unknown (sponsor has not verified the record since Sep 2024); last known: Enrolling by Invitation
  2. Trial status: Not Yet Recruiting to Enrolling by Invitation
    • Site contact updated
    v2
  3. Study First Submitted
  • Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
This is a multicenter, randomized controlled, prospective, non-inferiority, open-label study aiming to evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of using a 7F thin-walled sheath via distal radial artery (dTRA) access for coronary intervention (PCI) are non-inferior to the use of a 6F thin-walled sheath. The study population includes adult patients who are candidates for coronary intervention. The primary endpoint is the rate of radial artery and distal radial artery occlusion 24 hours post-procedure.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06585917
Lead Sponsor China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Conditions
(from sponsor)		 PCI, Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD)
Related terms Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Enrollment 574 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov