StoppedTrial terminatedSponsor's reason: The study is no longer relevant to have open to ensure insurance approval for this patient population
Study completion date changed from estimate of Aug 9, 2026 to Sep 9, 2026
Eligibility criteria shortened, about 17 words
MinorRe-verified, no change to tracked fieldsv19
NotableResults first posted: Apr 6, 2025v18
NotablePrimary endpoints: 11 to 21v17
MinorSecondary endpoints: 4 to 2v16
Show 14 earlier versionsHide 14 earlier versions
NotablePrimary endpoints revised (11)
Secondary endpoints revised (4)
v15
NotablePhase: Phase 2 to Not applicablev14
MinorPrimary completion date changed from estimate of Aug 31, 2022 to Sep 13, 2022v13
MinorPrimary completion date: Aug 9, 2022 to Aug 31, 2022v12
NotablePrimary completion date: Jul 31, 2024 to Aug 9, 2022v11Show 5 more changesShow less
Trial status: Recruiting to Active, Not Recruiting
Enrollment target: estimated 40 to confirmed 22
Study completion date: Apr 30, 2028 to Aug 9, 2026
Secondary endpoints: details revised at 4 of 4 entries
Site details revised
NotablePrimary completion date: Apr 30, 2022 to Jul 31, 2024
Study completion date: Apr 30, 2022 to Apr 30, 2028
v10
Minor3 versionsRe-verified since Nov 14, 2019, no change to tracked fieldsv7-v9
MinorEligibility criteria expanded, about 8 wordsv6
MinorSite contact updated
Eligibility criteria shortened, about 4 words
v5
MinorSite contact updatedv4
MinorRe-verified, no change to tracked fieldsv3
NotableTrial status: Not Yet Recruiting to Recruitingv2Show 4 more changesShow less
Primary and study completion dates: May 31, 2022 to Apr 30, 2022
Start date changed from estimate of May 2018 to Apr 19, 2018
Site details revised
Eligibility criteria expanded, about 2 words
MinorStudy First Submitted
Stopped: an ongoing trial was terminated, suspended or withdrawn.
Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
The investigators plan to include both operable and inoperable patients with esophagus cancer in this prospective trial. Since both proton and photon treatments are biologically equivalent, the investigators do not expect a difference in tumor control compared to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The investigators have a prospective experience of physician-reported toxicity and patient outcome using IMRT for patients with inoperable esophagus cancer that will serve as a comparison group. For the resectable patients receiving trimodality therapy (chemoradiation followed by surgery), the investigators will carefully track toxicity and patient outcomes prospectively. The central hypothesis is that the biologic efficacy for tumor control should be similar between protons and photons, and therefore survival measures should be similar between the two groups, but that the main difference lies in the total severe toxicities experienced by the patients undergoing therapy.