Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT00408005 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.
MinorTrial status: Active, Not Recruiting to CompletedStudy completion date changed from estimate of Mar 7, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025 · Start date: Jan 22, 2007 to Jan 30, 2007v667Show 2 more changesShow less
Study completion date changed from estimate of Mar 7, 2025 to Mar 31, 2025
MinorTrial status: Completed to Active, Not RecruitingCompletion date: Dec 31, 2017 to not stated · Study sites revised (215)v624Show 2 more changesShow less
NotableResults first posted: Jun 20, 2019Primary endpoints: 3 to 5 · Completion date: Sep 30, 2017 to Dec 31, 2017 · Secondary endpoint revisedv623Show 3 more changesShow less
MinorTrial status: Active, Not Recruiting to CompletedCompletion date: Sep 30, 2017v622Show 1 more changeShow less
Completion date: Sep 30, 2017
MinorRe-verified, no change to tracked fieldsv621
NotablePrimary endpoints: 6 to 3Secondary endpoints: 2 to 1 · Study description expanded, about 24 words · Study sites revised (215) · 1 morev620Show 4 more changesShow less
Stopped: an ongoing trial was terminated, suspended or withdrawn.
Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
This randomized phase III trial is studying different combination chemotherapy regimens and their side effects and comparing how well they work in treating young patients with newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Drugs used in chemotherapy work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more cancer cells. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. After a common induction therapy, patients were risk assigned and eligible for one or both post-induction randomizations: Escalating dose Methotrexate versus High Dose Methotrexate in Interim Maintenance therapy, No Nelarabine versus Nelarabine in Consolidation therapy. T-ALL patients are risk assigned as Low Risk, Intermediate Risk or High Risk. Low Risk patients are not eligible for the Nelarabine randomization, Patients with CNS disease at diagnosis were assgined to receive High Dose Methotrexate, patients who failed induction therapy were assigned to receive Nelarabine and High Dose Methotrexate. T-LLy patients were all assigned to escalating dose Methotrexate and were risk assigned as Standard Risk, High Risk and induction failures. Standard risk patients did not receive nelarabine, High risk T-LLy patients were randomized to No Nelarabine versus Nelarabine, and Induction failures were assigned to receive Nelarabine.