This record was last updated July 14, 2026 (before its estimated August 15, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
This study aims to examine how the timing of artificial intelligence (AI) integration during group brainstorming activities affects the creativity and ideation of participants. Undergraduate student participants will be randomly allocated into teams of four to complete a structured 12-minute brainstorming task. The study utilizes a three-group experimental design to compare three conditions: no AI access, AI access from the outset of the session, and AI access introduced halfway through the session. The standardized generative AI tool used is ChatGPT Pro. The creative output produced by each group will be evaluated by a panel of independent expert judges using the Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT).
Protocol Amendment History
1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2026-07-05.