Clinical Trial

Comparisons Of Biochemical And Clinical Outcomes Of Hemodialysis Patients Treated With Middle Cut-Off Dialyzers Versus High-Flux Hemodialysis Or Hemodiafiltration

Study acronym: CONCORDIA
Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated May 1, 2026 (before its estimated June 1, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
The CONCORDIA study is a retrospective, observational study evaluating clinical and biochemical outcomes among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis with medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzers (Theranova) compared with high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF). Using real-world data from non-DOPPS Theranova sites and the DOPPS cohort as an external control, the study aims to assess whether MCO dialyzers are associated with improved outcomes versus HF-HD and non-inferior outcomes compared with HDF. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality, with secondary outcomes including cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, infections, and laboratory measures related to anemia, mineral metabolism, and inflammation.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07561424
Lead Sponsor Arbor Research Collaborative for Health
Conditions ESKD, Dialysis Patients
Enrollment 1,000 participants
Start Date 2026-02-01
Primary Completion 2026-06-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-09-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-05-01