Comparison of Two Lower Limb Bypass Types : Prosthesis Versus Autologous Vein

Study acronym: REVA
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Started

Free. We email you which fields changed when ClinicalTrials.gov updates this record.

Track this trial
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

See every version on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

  1. Study sites: 0 to 1v7
  2. Re-verified, no change to tracked fieldsv6
  3. Trial status: Active, Not Recruiting to Completed
    • Primary and study completion dates changed from estimate of Dec 2010 to May 2011
    v5
  4. Study sites: 1 to 0v4 Show 4 more changesShow less
    • Primary completion date: Dec 2010
    • Interventions: femoropopliteal artery bypass (Device) to femoropopliteal artery bypass (Device), femoropopliteal artery bypass (Device)
    • Secondary endpoints revised (5)
    • Study arms: 0 to 2
  5. Study completion date: Dec 2010v3
  6. Trial status: Recruiting to Active, Not Recruiting
    • Secondary endpoints revised (5)
    • Site details revised
    v2
  7. Study First Submitted
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
When medical treatments fail, critical ischemia of the lower limb often leads to surgery, i.e. above knee femoro popliteal bypass. This bypass can be performed either with DACRON or PTFE prosthesis or with the autologous saphenous vein. Both technics are used but they have not been compared regarding bypass permeability and limb salvage. Thus, this study will compare the permeability rate of above knee femoro popliteal surgery whether performed with autologous vein versus prosthesis
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT00221715
Lead Sponsor University Hospital, Bordeaux
Collaborators: Ministry of Health, France
Conditions
(from sponsor)		 Arteritis, Diabetes
Related terms Arteritis, Diabetes Mellitus
Enrollment 100 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov