Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT07842809 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.

Track this trial

Capsular Tension Ring With Hydrophilic Versus Hydrophobic Intraocular Lenses

Study acronym: CTR-IOL-3ARM
StatusCompleted
PhaseNot applicable
Started
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

  1. Minor Study First Submitted
124 trials monitored
See 3 trials at risk
This study compares three approaches to cataract surgery. Cataract surgery involves removing the eye's cloudy natural lens and replacing it with an artificial intraocular lens (IOL) to restore clear vision. IOLs are made from different materials, most commonly a "hydrophilic" (water-attracting) acrylic or a "hydrophobic" (water-repelling) acrylic. Hydrophilic lenses are generally easier and less expensive to use, but have been linked in past research to a higher chance of the lens capsule becoming cloudy again after surgery (posterior capsule opacification, or PCO), sometimes requiring a follow-up laser treatment. Hydrophobic lenses tend to have lower rates of this problem but can cost more. A capsular tension ring (CTR) is a small flexible ring that can be placed inside the eye at the time of surgery to help hold the lens capsule in a stable, round shape. This study asks whether adding a CTR when a hydrophilic lens is used can reduce the disadvantages usually seen with that lens material. 600 adult patients (ages 50-80) undergoing cataract surgery at three hospitals in Egypt were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) a hydrophilic lens plus a CTR, (2) a hydrophobic lens alone (the common comparison approach), or (3) a hydrophilic lens alone without a CTR. Patients were followed for 24 months, and researchers compared vision, glasses prescription accuracy, lens position, capsule clouding, need for laser treatment, and surgical complications between the groups. The results showed that adding a CTR to a hydrophilic lens produced results very similar to using a hydrophobic lens alone. In contrast, using a hydrophilic lens without a CTR resulted in worse vision, less accurate glasses prescriptions, more lens shifting or tilting, more capsule clouding, a higher need for laser treatment, and more complications compared with the hydrophobic lens. These findings suggest that adding a CTR may be a simple, low-cost way to improve outcomes when a hydrophilic lens is used for cataract surgery.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07842809
Lead Sponsor Benha University
Conditions
(from sponsor)
Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery, Capsular Tension Ring, IOL Implantation
Enrollment 600 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov