This study aims to address the core deficiencies in the field by situating bronchoscopic ablation within the same evidentiary frame as segmentectomy and lobectomy. It will deliver adjusted retrospective comparisons with external validation using population data, a prospective noninferiority evaluation on disease control and safety, quantitative evidence on pulmonary function and quality of life, and translational endpoints linking circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) dynamics and immune activation to durability of control. The work is directly aligned with Hong Kong service needs, where a safe lung preserving option that shortens recovery and optimises resource use could relieve surgical waiting pressure while maintaining oncologic outcomes.