Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT07719374 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.

Track this trial

Medico-Economic Evaluation of MRI Versus CT as Diagnostic Imaging Strategies in Patients With Suspected Ischemic Stroke: the MAGRITTE Study.

Study acronym: MAGRITTE
StatusNot Yet Recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Started2026-09-01
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Amendment history

2026-08-31
minor
Study Identification, Study Status, Contacts/Locations v1
Study title-54 characters
[...] ging Strategies in Patients With Suspected Ischemic Stroke: Athe Prospective,MAGRITTE Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Two-Arm Parallel TrialStudy.
2026-07-17
minor
Original filing
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of death and long-term disability worldwide. In patients with suspected large vessel occlusion, rapid diagnosis and reperfusion therapy are critical, as treatment delays are associated with worse functional outcomes and increased mortality. Current French guidelines recommend brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference imaging modality because of its high diagnostic accuracy. However, MRI availability remains limited in many stroke centers, often resulting in delays in diagnosis and treatment. Conversely, computed tomography (CT) is more widely available and can substantially shorten time to reperfusion, although it may be less sensitive for early ischemic changes. The MAGRITTE study aims to determine whether an initial CT-based imaging strategy is more cost-effective than an MRI-based strategy for patients with suspected severe acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset. This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups enrolling 600 adult patients presenting with a high suspicion of acute ischemic stroke due to proximal large vessel occlusion (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale \[NIHSS\] score ≥10). Participants will be randomized to undergo either CT with CT angiography or MRI with MR angiography as the first-line diagnostic imaging examination. Additional perfusion imaging may be performed at the investigator's discretion. The primary objective is to compare the cost-utility of the two diagnostic strategies at 12 months, expressed as the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, using EQ-5D-5L-derived utilities. Secondary objectives include lifetime cost-effectiveness modeling, 5-year budget impact analysis, comparison of functional outcomes, mortality, imaging-to-treatment and reperfusion times, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, diagnostic accuracy, management pathways, adverse events, radiation exposure, and healthcare costs. The study will provide evidence on whether a CT-first imaging strategy can improve the efficiency of acute stroke care while maintaining favorable clinical outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07719374
Lead Sponsor Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
Collaborators: Université Paris Descartes- Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Appliquée en Économie-Gestion et Santé - LIRAES
Conditions Stroke
Enrollment 600 participants
Start Date 2026-09-01
Primary Completion 2030-09-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2030-09-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-09-02