Clinical Trial

Comparative Efficacy and Safety if Intravesical Botulinum Toxin A Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Management of Refractory Overactive Bladder : A 2 Year Study

Active, Not Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of intravesical Botulinum Toxin A versus intravesical Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in adults with refractory overactive bladder who have not responded adequately to conventional medical treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Whether intravesical PRP is as effective as intravesical Botulinum Toxin A in improving overactive bladder symptoms. * Whether intravesical PRP has a better safety profile and lower incidence of adverse events during the 2-year follow-up period. Researchers will compare participants receiving intravesical Botulinum Toxin A with those receiving intravesical PRP to determine differences in symptom improvement, quality of life, urodynamic outcomes, and treatment-related adverse events. Participants will: * Receive either intravesical Botulinum Toxin A injection or intravesical Platelet-Rich Plasma injection. * Undergo baseline clinical assessment, symptom evaluation, and urodynamic studies as indicated. * Attend scheduled follow-up visits over a 2-year period. * Complete validated questionnaires assessing overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life. * Be monitored for treatment efficacy and any adverse events throughout the study.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07693192
Lead Sponsor Mahmoud Mohamed Farag Ali
Conditions Overactive Bladder
Enrollment 60 participants
Start Date 2026-06-01
Primary Completion 2026-12-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-12-30 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-07-09