Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT07673406 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.

Track this trial

RECTOSACROUTEROPEXY vs. WELLS

Study acronym: RSUP
StatusActive, Not Recruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Started
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

  1. Study First Submitted
The goal of this clinical trial was to compare two surgical techniques in female patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. The main questions it aimed to answer were: 1. Does modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization improve postoperative anatomical outcomes compared with conventional Wells rectopexy? 2. Does modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization improve postoperative functional outcomes compared with conventional Wells rectopexy? Researchers compared modified rectosacrouteropexy with pelvic peritonization with conventional Wells rectopexy to assess postoperative recurrence, complications, anorectal manometry, defecography findings, and pelvic floor symptom scores. Participants underwent one of the assigned surgical procedures and were followed after surgery with clinical assessment and pelvic floor function testing.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07673406
Lead Sponsor Azerbaijan Medical University
Conditions
(from sponsor)		 Rectal Prolapse, Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)
Related terms Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Rectal Prolapse
Enrollment 36 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov