Clinical Trial

Impact of Concept Mapping in Case-Based Learning Among Medical Students

Completed
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
This prospective randomized study aims to compare the impact of three Case-Based Learning (CBL) approaches on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and clinical reasoning development among third-year medical students during their obstetrics and gynecology rotation. Participants are randomly assigned to one of three groups: CBL without concept mapping, CBL with a teacher-constructed concept map, or CBL with a concept map co-constructed by students during the learning session. Knowledge acquisition and retention are assessed using pre-tests, immediate post-tests, and delayed post-tests. Clinical reasoning and knowledge organization are evaluated using a synthesis exercise. The study seeks to determine whether concept mapping and the modality of its integration into CBL enhance learning outcomes and clinical reasoning skills in undergraduate medical education.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2026-06-07.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07643116
Lead Sponsor University Tunis El Manar
Conditions Medical Education, Clinical Reasoning, Case-based Learning, Concept Mapping Versus Interviews
Enrollment 26 participants
Start Date 2026-02-01
Primary Completion 2026-03-31 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-03-31 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-06-15