Clinical Trial

Reciprocal Inhibition vs PNF for Cervical Spondylitis

Study acronym: RI-PNF-CS
Active, Not Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Cervical spondylitis is a common cause of chronic neck pain and limited function. Physiotherapists often use two manual techniques: Reciprocal Inhibition (RI) and Passive Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) stretching. However, no previous study has directly compared these two techniques in patients with confirmed cervical spondylitis. This randomized controlled trial will include 60 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylitis based on clinical and imaging findings. Participants will be randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A will receive Reciprocal Inhibition Technique. Group B will receive Passive PNF Stretching. Both groups will receive 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with three sessions per week on alternate days. Pain will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Functional disability will be measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Cervical range of motion will be measured using a standard goniometer. All measurements will be taken at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. The goal is to determine which technique is more effective for reducing pain, improving function, and increasing neck mobility in cervical spondylitis patients
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07637812
Lead Sponsor University of Faisalabad
Conditions Cervical Spondylitis
Enrollment 60 participants
Start Date 2026-01-01
Primary Completion 2026-05-24 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-06-15 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-06-10