Air vs. Liquid: A Study on Cystoscopy Performance and Visibility Enhancement in Macrohematuria Cases

Macroscopic haematuria is a common urological emergency. Diagnostic cystoscopy is the gold standard for identifying the bleeding source; however, blood and clots within the bladder significantly impair endoscopic visibility when saline is used as the distension medium. Air-based cystoscopy, a technique first described in the 19th century, exploits the immiscibility of gas and blood to maintain clear visualisation even during active bleeding. Despite its theoretical advantages, no randomised clinical data exist to support its use. AIROSCOPY is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-centre superiority study comparing air-based versus saline-based flexible cystoscopy in patients with macroscopic haematuria (Grade III-V). Patients are randomised 1:1. Only the index cystoscopy (first randomised modality) contributes to all study endpoints. A second cystoscopy with the alternative modality is performed solely for patient safety to ensure no diagnostic disadvantage from study participation. This second examination is not analysed. The primary endpoint is identification of the bleeding source during the index cystoscopy (binary: yes/no). Secondary endpoints include time to source identification, total procedure duration, urologist-rated visibility (Likert scale), and patient comfort (Likert scale).

NCT Number	NCT07618221
Lead Sponsor	Kantonsspital Baden
Conditions	Macrohematuria
Enrollment	40 participants
Start Date	2026-07-01
Primary Completion	2028-02-01 (estimated)
Study Completion	2028-06-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov	2026-06-03