Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT07612748 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.

Track this trial

Two Different Endoscopic Treatments for Rectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Started
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

See every version on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

  1. Notable Recruitment opened
    • Study sites: 1 to 2
    • Eligibility criteria shortened, about 7 words
    • Study description expanded, about 4 words
    v2
  2. Minor Study First Submitted
  • Stopped: an ongoing trial was terminated, suspended or withdrawn.
  • Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
The aim is to compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus endoscopic partial muscle resection( EPMR) for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (R-NENs), thereby providing guidance for optimizing therapeutic strategies. The investigators retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with R-NENs who underwent endoscopic resection at our center between January 2020 and February 2026. Patients were assigned to either the ESD group or the EPMR group. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared, including the number of lesions, maximum lesion diameter, single-lesion procedure time, postoperative complications, positive margin rate, pathological staging, lymphovascular invasion, and the need for additional therapies.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07612748
Lead Sponsor Jilin University
Conditions
(from sponsor)
Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors, ESD, EPMR
Enrollment 483 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov