Clinical Trial

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Pectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse, particularly apical prolapse, is a common condition among aging women, and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is considered the standard surgical treatment due to its high anatomical success. However, it poses technical challenges and risks related to sacral dissection. Laparoscopic pectopexy, a newer technique using the iliopectineal ligament for mesh fixation, offers a safer anatomical route with shorter operative time and fewer complications. The previous studies evaluate the sacrocolpopexy and pectopexy are all retrospective. This study is prospective randomized controlled study that adds Comparison on the success rate and learning curve of pectopexy versus sacrocolpopexy .
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07596498
Lead Sponsor Ain Shams University
Conditions Apical Prolapse
Enrollment 30 participants
Start Date 2026-04-01
Primary Completion 2026-10-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-10-10 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-05-19