Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT07590674 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.

Track this trial

Effect of Reactive Balance Training Versus Conventional Balance Training on Dynamic Stability and Change-of-Direction Performance in Competitive Tennis Players

StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Started
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Record status
This record was last updated June 26, 2026 (before its estimated July 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.

Record History

  1. Start date changed from estimate of May 2026 to May 15, 2026v2
  2. Study First Submitted
  • Stopped: an ongoing trial was terminated, suspended or withdrawn.
  • Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of reactive balance training versus conventional balance training on dynamic stability and change of direction performance. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups. Each group will receive its respective intervention over a 6-week period. Outcome measures, including dynamic stability assessed by the Y-Balance Test and change-of-direction performance measured using the 505 Agility Test, will be evaluated at baseline and after the intervention. The study is designed to determine which training approach is more effective in improving balance and functional performance.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07590674
Lead Sponsor Ibadat International University, Islamabad
Conditions
(from sponsor)		 Dynamic Stability, Athletic Performance, Postural Balance
Enrollment 64 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov