Clinical Trial

Continuous vs Bolus Neuromuscular Blockade Regimens in Moderate to Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and ARDS (COBRA)

Study acronym: COBRA
Not Yet Recruiting Phase 2
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Current clinical guidelines, such as those from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and ARDSNet, recommend short-term NMBA use for patients with moderate to severe ARDS who exhibit persistent ventilator dyssynchrony or high plateau pressures despite deep sedation . However, they do not provide clear recommendations regarding the mode of administration. As a result, clinicians are left to extrapolate from limited or indirect evidence, which may lead to practice variation, uncertainty, and suboptimal care. This pilot randomized controlled trial is designed to directly address this critical gap by comparing intermittent bolus administration versus continuous infusion of NMBAs in a pragmatic, real-world ICU setting. The study will assess feasibility metrics necessary to plan a definitive trial and generate preliminary clinical data on safety and effectiveness. By clarifying the comparative benefits and risks of each approach, the results may influence practice guidelines, reduce variation in care, and improve patient outcomes and reduce practice variation.patient outcomes, optimize resource use, and inform future guidelines on the management of moderate to severe ARDS.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2026-04-30.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07567768
Lead Sponsor University of Calgary
Conditions ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
Enrollment 100 participants
Start Date 2027-01-01
Primary Completion 2027-01-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2028-01-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-05-14