Clinical Trial

Flywheel vs Traditional Resistance Training for Change of Direction in Elite Soccer Players

Study acronym: UFRT-COD
Completed
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of unilateral flywheel resistance training and unilateral traditional resistance training on change-of-direction performance in elite male soccer players. A total of 22 elite soccer players will be randomly assigned to either a flywheel resistance training group or a traditional resistance training group. Both groups will perform supervised training twice per week for 8 weeks in addition to their regular soccer training. Performance outcomes will include linear sprint tests (10 m and 30 m), pre-planned change-of-direction tests (Pro-agility, T-test, Arrowhead test), and agility tests under no-ball and with-ball conditions (AFL agility test). The primary outcome is change-of-direction performance assessed by the T-test. Secondary outcomes include direction-specific change-of-direction ability and agility performance. It is hypothesized that unilateral flywheel resistance training will produce greater improvements in change-of-direction performance compared with traditional resistance training, particularly in tasks involving braking and re-acceleration.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2026-04-28.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07567677
Lead Sponsor Beijing Sport University
Conditions Change of Direction Performance, Athletic Performance
Enrollment 22 participants
Start Date 2026-02-20
Primary Completion 2026-04-20 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-04-21 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-05-08