Clinical Trial

Artificial Intelligence-Generated vs Academician-Developed Multiple True/False Questions in Anesthesiology Education

Completed
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and educational value of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated multiple true/false questions compared to those developed by experienced academicians in anesthesiology training. A total of 27 anesthesiology residents will be included in the study. Question sets consisting of 200 multiple true/false items will be created, with half generated by academicians and the other half generated using an artificial intelligence model (ChatGPT-based system). The questions will be based on standardized educational materials from the anesthesiology training curriculum. Participants will complete the test in a single session. Each correct answer will be scored as one point, and total scores will be calculated. In addition to test performance, item difficulty, discrimination indices, and test reliability will be analyzed. Furthermore, participants' perceptions regarding question quality will be evaluated. The study aims to determine whether AI-generated questions can provide a reliable and effective alternative to traditional question development methods in medical education and contribute to more objective and standardized assessment processes.
Protocol Amendment History 2 changes
critical Trial status changed: Not Yet Recruiting → Completed 2026-05-07
minor Completion moved earlier: 2026-05-30 -> 2026-04-30 2026-05-07
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07522658
Lead Sponsor Kutahya Health Sciences University
Conditions Medical Education, Artificial Intelligence, Assessment Methods in Medical Training
Enrollment 26 participants
Start Date 2026-04-14
Primary Completion 2026-04-20 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-04-30 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-05-06