Physical Recovery During Bracing After Ankle Fracture (Re-BAF)

Study acronym: Re-BAF
StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Started

Free. We email you which fields changed when ClinicalTrials.gov updates this record.

Track this trial
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

See every version on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

  1. Notable Recruitment opened Show 5 more changesShow less
    • Start date changed from estimate of Apr 1, 2026 to Jun 1, 2026
    • Eligibility criteria expanded, about 10 words
    • Secondary endpoints: details revised at 3 of 4 entries
    • Site details revised
    • Publications: details revised at 11 of 13 entries
  2. Minor Study First Submitted
  • Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
Ankle fractures are among the most common fractures and represent the second most frequent fracture type requiring surgery. Many patients experience long-term pain, stiffness, and reduced ankle function, which substantially limits their physical activity. Even five years after injury, more than a third of patients have not regained their pre-injury activity levels. Standard treatment typically involves immobilisation using a rigid foot-ankle brace (walker). Although effective in protecting fracture healing, these braces may be overly restrictive, contributing to ankle stiffness, swelling, delayed physical recovery and return to daily activities, and reduced quality of life. Patients increasingly express a preference for lighter, movement-permitting ankle supports, such as minimal ankle stirrups. Recent evidence suggests that braces and elastic bands that allow more ankle movement than walkers may enhance faster recovery without increasing complications. However, high quality evidence is necessary for more robust conclusions. The Scandinavian Bracing after Ankle Fracture (BAF) multicentre randomised controlled trial (NCT07163091) therefore investigates whether an ankle stirrup is non-inferior to a standard walker with respect to patient-reported ankle pain and function, measured by the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) three months after ankle fracture. The primary hypothesis is that ankle stirrups better align with patients' preferences for less restrictive bracing while providing sufficient stability during fracture healing. Secondarily, ankle stirrups may promote faster recovery and physical activity. The Re-BAF trial is nested within a larger multicentre non-inferiority trial (Bracing after Ankle Fracture \[BAF\], ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07163091), aiming to investigate whether an ankle stirrup is non-inferior to a standard foot-ankle brace in improving patient-reported foot and ankle function, as measured by the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (\[MOXFQ\], primary BAF outcome) after ankle fracture. The aim of the Re-BAF trial is to investigate whether ankle stirrups are superior to standard foot-ankle braces in improving physical activity, assessed using objectively measured thigh-worn accelerometry from baseline (i.e. randomisation) to 12-week follow-up. We hypothesize that early and continuous movement during rehabilitation, enabled by an ankle stirrup, is superior in improving physical activity compared with a foot-ankle brace, without compromising fracture healing.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07521696
Lead Sponsor Odense University Hospital
Collaborators: Aarhus University Hospital, Zealand University Hospital, Sygehus Lillebaelt
Conditions
(from sponsor)
Ankle Fracture, Recovery, Physical Activity, Rehabilitation
Related terms Ankle Fractures, Motor Activity
Enrollment 280 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov