Clinical Trial

PENG vs Deep Iliacus Plane Block in Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures

Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Intertrochanteric femur fractures are common in elderly patients and are associated with significant pain. Providing effective analgesia is clinically important both during positioning for spinal anesthesia and in the postoperative period in this patient population. The Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block is a regional anesthesia technique that targets the articular branches of the hip capsule and may provide effective analgesia with motor-sparing potential. The Deep Iliacus Plane Block (DIPB) is a newer approach that may spread to both the articular branches and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Although both blocks are used in patients with intertrochanteric fractures, there is a lack of sufficient randomized controlled data comparing their effectiveness for pain during positioning for spinal anesthesia and for postoperative analgesia. Therefore, it is important to determine which technique provides greater clinical benefit. The aim of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of the PENG block and the Deep Iliacus Plane Block during positioning for spinal anesthesia and in the postoperative period in patients undergoing surgery for intertrochanteric femur fractures.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07513740
Lead Sponsor Erzincan Binali Yildirim Universitesi
Conditions Postoperative Analgesia, Hip Surgery
Enrollment 75 participants
Start Date 2026-03-01
Primary Completion 2027-03-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2027-03-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-04-07