Clinical Trial

Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Trigger Fingers: Longitudinal Opening Versus Complete A1 Pulley Release

Study acronym: TRIGGER
Not Yet Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Trigger finger is a pathology of the flexor tendons caused by inflammation of the tendon or its sheath, leading to pain, nodules, fibrosis, and limited mobility. Surgical treatment aims to release the space at the level of the A1 pulley, either through longitudinal opening (the standard technique, but associated with recurrence rates of approximately 7.7%) or through complete resection, an emerging approach that may reduce recurrences and the need for reoperations. However, comparative data remain limited, justifying further investigation. This project therefore aims to compare these two surgical techniques to determine which one results in the lowest recurrence rate and to assess their functional outcomes (pain, range of motion). The primary hypothesis is that A1 pulley resection reduces recurrences after one year, while the secondary hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in postoperative pain or mobility.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2026-03-23.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07497061
Lead Sponsor Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Conditions Trigger Digit, Trigger Finger
Enrollment 236 participants
Start Date 2026-04-01
Primary Completion 2029-04-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2029-04-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-03-31