Low-flow Versus Minimal-flow Sevoflurane Anesthesia During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Study Synopsis This protocol is formatted for ClinicalTrials.gov-style registration and manuscript-facing documentation. It is based on the uploaded Turkish ethics protocol and keeps the original core design: comparison of low-flow and minimal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Background and Rationale Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is increasingly preferred for localized prostate cancer because of lower blood loss, reduced transfusion requirements, shorter hospitalization, and lower complication rates compared with open surgery. However, RALRP requires carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning, both of which may adversely affect respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamic stability. Low-flow and minimal-flow anesthesia may improve humidification and warming of inspired gases, reduce inhalational agent consumption, decrease environmental waste, and potentially lower overall cost. Despite these theoretical and practical advantages, evidence remains limited regarding the physiologic safety and performance of minimal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia during long robotic pelvic surgery performed under pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning. Accordingly, this randomized prospective trial will compare low-flow (1 L/min) and minimal-flow (0.5 L/min) sevoflurane anesthesia during RALRP with respect to respiratory parameters, arterial blood gas values, intraoperative oxygenation variables, anesthetic consumption, and selected postoperative biochemical markers.

NCT Number	NCT07475533
Lead Sponsor	Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Conditions	Prostate Cancer, Anesthesia, Respiratory Mechanics
Enrollment	70 participants
Start Date	2026-03-20
Primary Completion	2026-04-20 (estimated)
Study Completion	2026-08-31 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov	2026-04-15