Redesigning Surgical Care for Patients in Wisconsin

This study evaluates strategies to train surgeons to use Better Conversations, an evidence-based communication framework designed to improve informed consent by helping patients understand the goals of surgery, the downsides of treatment, and what to expect. Better Conversations supports deliberation, patient preparation, and alignment of decisions with patient goals, addressing known shortcomings in traditional informed consent. The purpose of this study is to compare two methods of surgeon training: (1) training delivered by an education specialist using audit and feedback, and (2) training supported by computerized automation that identifies elements of Better Conversations in de-identified transcripts of surgical consultations. The central question is whether the automated training program is non-inferior to the specialist-delivered program. Approximately 60 surgeons from two academic health systems will be randomized to one of these training approaches. Each surgeon will complete a didactic session, have outpatient surgical consultations audio-recorded for feedback, and complete assessment recordings after training. Patients of enrolled surgeons will complete surveys before and after their surgeon's training to evaluate patient-reported communication outcomes. Findings from this study will assess the effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of automated training and support the development of a larger pragmatic study to evaluate the broader effects of Better Conversations on patient outcomes.

NCT Number	NCT07475104
Lead Sponsor	University of Wisconsin, Madison Collaborators: Wisconsin Partnership Program, Medical College of Wisconsin
Conditions	Communication, Surgery, Shared Decision Making
Enrollment	660 participants
Start Date	2026-02-27
Primary Completion	2028-03-31 (estimated)
Study Completion	2028-08-31 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov	2026-05-04