Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Chloroprocaine HCl Ophthalmic Gel 3% vs Proparacaine Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% Plus Subconjunctival Lidocaine in Patients Undergoing Intravitreal Injections

This Phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-masked clinical study evaluates the efficacy and safety of chloroprocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel 3% (IHEEZO) compared with routine anesthesia (topical proparacaine 0.5% combined with subconjunctival lidocaine 2%) for ocular surface anesthesia during intravitreal injection procedures. Adult participants scheduled to undergo unilateral intravitreal injection of an FDA-approved anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent for retinal conditions will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IHEEZO with a sham subconjunctival procedure or routine anesthesia. The primary objective is to determine whether IHEEZO is non-inferior to routine anesthesia in achieving successful ocular surface anesthesia, defined as a participant-reported pain score of 0 or 1 (on a 0-5 ordinal pain scale) immediately before and immediately after intravitreal injection. Secondary outcomes include individual and cumulative pain scores, change from baseline in dry eye symptoms measured by the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire, and ocular safety assessments through Day 7 follow-up.

NCT Number	NCT07456826
Lead Sponsor	Harrow Inc
Conditions	Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD), Retinal Vein Occlusion, Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)
Enrollment	236 participants
Start Date	2026-03-31
Primary Completion	2026-08 (estimated)
Study Completion	2026-08 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov	2026-04-07