Introduction:
Pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PRPs) are known to reduce symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue, while improving functional capacity and quality of life in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the benefits of an initial pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) tend to diminish rapidly over time, prompting the development of strategies to maintain these effects. Such strategies include supervised exercise programs, telephone follow-ups, and home-based exercise regimens. Nevertheless, the optimal maintenance strategy remains uncertain.
Objectives:
The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of a supervised, multidimensional maintenance PRP on symptoms and quality of life in individuals with COPD. Additionally, the study aims to compare exercise capacity, healthcare resource utilization, economic benefits, and participant perceptions between the intervention and control groups.
Methodology:
A 12-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel groups will be conducted in adults with COPD who have completed an initial 8-week PRP. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention or control group. The intervention group will undergo a maintenance PRP consisting of two weekly supervised exercise sessions and monthly educational sessions on COPD in a comprehensive health center over a 3-month period. The control group will receive standard clinical care recommendations regarding physical activity. Clinical evaluations will be conducted at four time points throughout the study: baseline (T0), 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3). Full pulmonary function tests and anthropometric assessments will be performed at T0 and T3. Other variables, including symptom burden, quality of life, functional capacity, mental health, physical activity, sleep-wake pattern, and healthcare utilization, will be systematically collected at all four time points.