Clinical Trial

Comparison of the Efficacy of Perineal and Intravaginal Electrical Stimulation in Women With Idiopathic Overactive Bladder

Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
The investigators conducted a prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study based on a placebo technique to evaluate the efficacy of IVES vs perineal ES in women with idiopathic OAB. The main questions aimed to be answered are: Is Intravaginal Electrical Stimulation (IVES) or perineal ES more effective on clinical parameters related to incontinence and quality of life in women with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB)? Participants (n:63) with idiopathic OAB who meet the exclusion and inclusion criteria will be divided into 3 groups using a randomization table. The first group will receive IVES and bladder training (n:21), second group will receive perineal ES and bladder training (n:21) and third group will receive bladder training (n=21) . Measurements will be performed twice in total, before and at the end of treatment (8th week).
Protocol Amendment History 1 change
critical Primary endpoint(s) modified 2026-07-30
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07366918
Lead Sponsor Pamukkale University
Conditions Urinary Bladder, Overactive
Enrollment 63 participants
Start Date 2025-12-01
Primary Completion 2026-12-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2027-01-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-07-29