Clinical Trial

Surgery for Unstable Chest Wall Injuries - How Many Fractures Should be Fixed?

Not Yet Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
The goal of this prospective, randomized study is to learn about the effects of two different surgical techniques for treating unstable chest wall injuries in adults. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does fixing two fractures per rib lead to better healing than fixing one fracture per rib in patients with unstable chest injuries? Does the choice of surgical method affect lung function, pain, other symptoms, risk of pneumonia, or the risk of complications? Participants will: * Undergo surgery using either the standard method (fixing one fracture per rib) or an alternative method (fixing two fractures per rib), both using a muscle-sparing technique. * Be followed up at 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery. * Have CT scans at 3 months (and at 12 months if healing is incomplete) to assess bone healing. * Be evaluated for lung function, pain, symptoms, and complications. This study aims to provide new knowledge about which surgical method is best for unstable chest wall injuries, helping to improve treatment and recovery for these patients.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2026-01-03.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07338656
Lead Sponsor Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Conditions Rib Fracture Multiple, Flail Chest
Enrollment 100 participants
Start Date 2026-05-05
Primary Completion 2027-12 (estimated)
Study Completion 2028-12 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-04-28