Clinical Trial

Comparison of Abdominal Expansion and Abdominal Drawing-In Training With Manual and Verbal Cueing in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Not Yet Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated January 23, 2026 (before its estimated June 30, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
This study aims to investigate the interactive effects of two core stability training strategies-abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre (ADIM) and Dynamic Neuromusculoskeletal Stabilization abdominal expansion (DNS-AE)-and two instructional approaches (verbal cueing and manual facilitation) on training outcomes in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain. A 2×2 factorial randomized controlled trial design will be employed. Ninety-six participants with chronic non-specific low back pain will be randomly allocated, using block randomization, to one of four intervention groups in equal proportions. All groups will receive a 4-week intervention program, with training conducted twice per week. Outcome measures will be assessed at four time points: before the intervention (baseline), immediately after the first training session, at the completion of the 4-week intervention, and at a 3-month follow-up, to evaluate short-term and mid-term effects as well as the sustainability of training outcomes.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2025-12-23.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07318454
Lead Sponsor National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Conditions Chronic Low Back Pain (Non-specific, Uncomplicated)
Enrollment 96 participants
Start Date 2026-04-01
Primary Completion 2026-06-30 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-09-30 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-01-23