Clinical Trial

Effect of Scapular Retraction Exercises Versus McKenzie Method on CVA

Completed
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
The goal of this quasi-experimental study is to compare the effectiveness of scapular retraction exercises versus the McKenzie method in improving craniovertebral angle (CVA), reducing neck pain, and minimizing neck disability among university students exhibiting forward head posture. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer \[is/are\]: * Which of both exercises (scapular retraction or McKenzie method exercises) will be more effective in improvement craniovertebral alignment, alleviated pain, and decreased neck disability? Group A performed scapular retraction exercises, while Group B practiced McKenzie method exercises. Both interventions were administered for 20 minutes, three times weekly over eight weeks.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2025-12-19.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07317999
Lead Sponsor Mansoura University
Conditions Forward Head Posture, Craniovertebral Angle, Neck Disability
Enrollment 116 participants
Start Date 2024-10-01
Primary Completion 2024-12-12 (estimated)
Study Completion 2025-02-07 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-01-06