Clinical Trial

Comparison of Lithotomy Versus Lateral Position in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lower Calyceal Stones Less Than 2 cm

Not Yet Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated December 30, 2025 (before its estimated May 1, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is an established minimally invasive treatment for renal stones, particularly for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm, offering acceptable stone-free rates with low morbidity. However, stone clearance in the lower calyx remains technically challenging due to unfavorable anatomy, limited scope deflection, and gravity-dependent fragment retention. Patient positioning during RIRS has been suggested as a modifiable factor that may influence endoscopic access, stone relocation, and surgical ergonomics. The lithotomy position is conventionally used during RIRS, while the lateral position has been proposed to facilitate stone migration and improve lower calyceal access through gravitational assistance. Existing studies comparing patient positioning during RIRS are limited, with most evidence derived from retrospective analyses or non-randomized designs. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aims to compare lithotomy versus lateral positioning during RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm in terms of operative and clinical outcomes.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07310966
Lead Sponsor Menoufia University
Conditions Renal Calculi
Enrollment 70 participants
Start Date 2026-01-01
Primary Completion 2026-05-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-06-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-12-30