Clinical Trial

Comparison Between Two Methods for Renal Stone Treatment Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Flexible Ureteroscopy With Suction Sheath

Study acronym: mini-PCNL/FANS
Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated December 29, 2025 (before its estimated August 15, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two modern, minimally invasive surgical techniques for the removal of kidney stones: Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) with Flexible and navigable suction sheath The primary objective is to determine which procedure results in a higher stone-free rate, as measured by post-operative imaging. Secondary objectives include comparing operative time, hospitalization length andcomplication rates between the two treatment groups. Patients with two to three centimeter kidney stones who are candidates for either procedure will be randomly assigned to undergo either Mini-PCNL or suctioning FURS. The outcomes will be critically assessed to help establish a higher level of evidence for guiding surgical management of kidney stones.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07306819
Lead Sponsor Ain Shams University
Conditions Stone;Renal, Stone, Urinary, Stone, Kidney, Stone Clearance
Enrollment 120 participants
Start Date 2025-10-15
Primary Completion 2026-08-15 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-09-15 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-12-29