Clinical Trial

PENG Block vs Suprainguinal FICB vs Lumbar ESPB for Analgesia After Hip Surgery

Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
This randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial compares three motor-sparing regional anesthesia techniques used for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block, the suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (S-FICB), and the Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB). Although all three techniques are widely used in modern hip surgery, their relative analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing potential, and impact on early functional recovery have not been directly compared in a single study. The primary objective is to determine which block provides the most effective postoperative analgesia while preserving motor function and facilitating early mobilization. Secondary objectives include comparisons of opioid consumption, pain scores at rest and during movement, time to first rescue analgesia, block-related adverse events, quadriceps strength, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and early functional outcomes. This study aims to identify the optimal motor-sparing regional anesthesia strategy for older adults undergoing hip arthroplasty.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2025-12-04.
Status change: Not Yet Recruiting → Recruiting 2026-03-02
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07288983
Lead Sponsor Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Conditions Hip Osteoarthritis
Enrollment 93 participants
Start Date 2026-02-06
Primary Completion 2027-01-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2027-01-31 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-03-04