Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT07266662 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.

Track this trial

Comparative Effects of Sensory Augmentation and Neuromodulation on Enhancing Motor Recovery Among Stroke Survivors

StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Started
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Record status
This record was last updated December 17, 2025 (before its estimated May 25, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.

Record History

  1. Notable Trial status: Not Yet Recruiting to Recruiting
    • Study sites: 1 to 2
    v2
  2. Minor Study First Submitted
  • Stopped: an ongoing trial was terminated, suspended or withdrawn.
  • Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of two rehabilitation techniques-Sensory Augmentation (using mirror therapy) and Neuromodulation (using transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS)-in improving motor recovery among stroke survivors. Stroke often results in long-term impairments, particularly in upper limb motor function, which is critical for daily activities. Although current rehabilitation strategies help, more effective solutions are needed to enhance recovery. Participants, aged 45-65 with chronic stroke and upper extremity impairments, will be randomized into three groups: Group 1 will receive a combination of sensory augmentation (mirror therapy) and neuromodulation (tDCS) with routine physical therapy; Group 2 will receive sensory augmentation (mirror therapy) with routine physical therapy; and Group 3 will receive neuromodulation (tDCS) with routine physical therapy. The interventions will take place four times a week for 8 weeks, and participants will undergo motor function assessments, including the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Jebsen-Taylor Test, before and after the intervention. The study will compare the effects of each intervention on motor recovery, specifically focusing on upper limb function and motor control. The findings could lead to improved rehabilitation protocols, offering stroke survivors better therapeutic options and enhancing their quality of life.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07266662
Lead Sponsor Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
Conditions
(from sponsor)
Stroke (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack
Related terms Ischemic Attack, Transient, Stroke
Enrollment 36 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov