Clinical Trial

Comparison of Dressing Materials of Donor Site of Split-thickness Skin Graft; Paraffin Mesh Gauze vs Povidone-Iodine Foam at SMBB Institute of Trauma Karachi

Not Yet Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated December 15, 2025 (before its estimated April 15, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if povidone-iodine foam dressing is better in achieving complete reepithelialization of donor site wounds after harvest of split-thickness skin graft as paraffin mesh gauze. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does povidone-iodine foam dressing promotes complete reepithelialization earlier in comparison? Which type of dressing will require fewer replacements? Which type of dressing material is associated with less pain? Non-probability consecutive sampling method will be used and participants divided in two groups. Donor site wounds after split-thickness skin graft harvest will be dressed using two different dressing materials. Participants will be followed until complete epithelialization with change of dressing on follow-ups if required. Complete epithelialization is usually achieved within two weeks.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2025-12-01.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07257991
Lead Sponsor Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institue of Trauma
Conditions Skin Graft Wounds
Enrollment 82 participants
Start Date 2026-01-01
Primary Completion 2026-04-15 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-05-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-12-15