Clinical Trial

Pulmonary Volume Changes During Synchonized Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

Study acronym: INSPIRE
Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Current evidence suggests that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is more effective than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preventing respiratory failure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), both as initial and post-extubation support. NIPPV may be delivered in synchronized (sNIPPV) or non-synchronized (nsNIPPV) modes, with sNIPPV offering clear benefits by coordinating support with the infant's own breathing. Recent studies indicate sNIPPV is superior to nsNIPPV in preventing respiratory failure, though the intrapulmonary mechanisms behind this advantage remain unclear. To address this, the present study uses Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to evaluate how lung volume changes during different types of breaths and ventilator inflations - spontaneous breaths, synchronized inflations, non-synchronized inflations, and backup inflations - in preterm infants receiving sNIPPV.
Protocol Amendment History 2 amendments
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended 2 times since 2025-11-14; most recent amendment 2025-12-08.
Status change: Not Yet Recruiting → Recruiting 2025-11-20
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07237139
Lead Sponsor University of Zurich
Collaborators: University Hospital, Zürich
Conditions Infant, Preterm, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal), Chronic Lung Disease of Newborn, Respiratory Support, Synchronized Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (SNIPPV), Lung Volume
Enrollment 27 participants
Start Date 2025-11-17
Primary Completion 2026-12-31 (estimated)
Study Completion 2027-01-30 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-12-09