Hypnobreastfeeding vs. Traditional Education

Breastfeeding is a vital component of maternal and infant health, and its success is closely linked to the mother's psychological readiness, self-efficacy, and perception of milk sufficiency. In recent years, alternative educational approaches such as hypnobreastfeeding, which integrates hypnosis and relaxation techniques into prenatal education, have gained increasing attention. These approaches aim to improve maternal self-efficacy, reduce stress and anxiety during the breastfeeding period, and promote better adaptation to breastfeeding in the early postpartum phase. Traditional prenatal breastfeeding education primarily focuses on anatomical, physiological, and practical aspects of breastfeeding. While effective, this approach may not sufficiently address maternal fears, emotional barriers, or negative birth experiences that can undermine breastfeeding outcomes. In contrast, hypnobreastfeeding education incorporates guided imagery, affirmations, breathing techniques, and deep relaxation, offering a more holistic preparation for breastfeeding. Emerging studies suggest that mothers who receive hypnobreastfeeding training demonstrate higher levels of breastfeeding self-efficacy, stronger emotional bonding, better adaptation to breastfeeding, and lower perceptions of insufficient milk compared to those receiving standard education. This review explores the comparative effectiveness of hypnobreastfeeding versus traditional prenatal breastfeeding education, focusing on three key outcomes: maternal self-efficacy, breastfeeding adaptation, and perceived insufficient milk supply. The findings indicate that combining psychological readiness techniques with conventional education may enhance maternal confidence and breastfeeding continuity. Further research with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up is needed to validate the integration of hypnobreastfeeding into routine antenatal care.

NCT Number	NCT07190521
Lead Sponsor	Sakarya University
Conditions	Breastfeeding
Enrollment	111 participants
Start Date	2025-09-25
Primary Completion	2025-11-15 (estimated)
Study Completion	2025-12-20 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov	2025-09-24