Clinical Trial

Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol in High-Risk ERCP Patients

Completed
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
ERCP requires deep sedation due to pain and discomfort, but propofol-commonly used with opioids-often causes respiratory and cardiovascular complications, especially in elderly or high-risk patients. Dexmedetomidine offers sedation without respiratory depression but may lower blood pressure and heart rate. Current monitoring often relies only on SpO₂, while capnography and the Integrated Pulmonary Index (IPI) provide earlier detection of respiratory events but are underused in ERCP studies. This study compares dexmedetomidine and propofol in high-risk ERCP patients, focusing on respiratory and hemodynamic effects, propofol consumption, recovery, and discharge times. The hypothesis is that dexmedetomidine will cause fewer adverse respiratory and hemodynamic effects.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2025-09-03.
Status change: Recruiting → Completed 2026-05-06
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07166614
Lead Sponsor Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Conditions Respiratory Depression, Hypoxemia, Hypotension Drug-Induced, Bradycardia
Enrollment 100 participants
Start Date 2025-09-03
Primary Completion 2026-02-28 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-04-15 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-05-11