Clinical Trial

Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques

Study acronym: vnotes
Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated July 24, 2025 (before its estimated January 1, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes, safety profiles, and patient satisfaction between two minimally invasive techniques for pelvic organ prolapse repair: Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (V-NOTES) mesh-free sacrocolpopexy and laparoscopic mesh-free sacrocolpopexy. By evaluating perioperative data, complication rates, anatomical and functional outcomes, this trial seeks to determine whether the V-NOTES approach provides comparable or superior results to the traditional laparoscopic technique, without the use of synthetic mesh.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07082023
Lead Sponsor Havva Betül Bacak
Conditions Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Enrollment 52 participants
Start Date 2025-07-01
Primary Completion 2026-01-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-01-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-07-24