Clinical Trial

Comparing the Attentional Demands and Functional Outcomes in People With Transradial Amputation

Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Summary
Different ways of controlling an upper-limb prosthesis can affect how easy it is to use and how helpful it is in everyday activities. One common method, called direct control, uses signals from two muscles and can make switching between movements difficult. Another clinically available option, called pattern recognition control, uses signals from several muscles to better understand the user's intended movement and may feel more natural to use. This study compares these two control methods to see how they affect function for adults with below-the-elbow limb loss.
Protocol Amendment History 3 changes
critical Primary endpoint(s) modified 2026-04-10
notable Primary completion pushed: 2027-01 -> 2027-07 2026-04-10
minor Completion pushed: 2027-01 -> 2027-12 2026-04-10
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT07075042
Lead Sponsor Virginia Commonwealth University
Collaborators: United States Department of Defense, Hanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, LLC
Conditions Amputation, Prosthesis Use
Enrollment 32 participants
Start Date 2026-07
Primary Completion 2027-07 (estimated)
Study Completion 2027-12 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2026-06-08