Clinical Trial

Comparative Analysis of Median Nerve Parameters for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Diagnosis: Ultrasound Versus Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS)

Not Yet Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated April 15, 2025 (before its estimated July 1, 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
Comparative Analysis of Median Nerve Parameters for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Diagnosis: Ultrasound vs. Nerve Conduction Study (NCS) This clinical study aims to determine whether ultrasound can be as practical as NCS in diagnosing CTS. It will also evaluate the accuracy of different median nerve measurements in both tests. The main questions it aims to answer are: Can ultrasound accurately detect CTS compared to NCS? Which median nerve measurements (such as size, speed, or function) are most useful for diagnosis? Researchers will compare ultrasound and NCS results in patients with CTS symptoms to determine which test is more reliable and patient-friendly. Participants will: 1. Undergo both an ultrasound and a NCS for comparison. 2. Visit the clinic for testing and evaluation as part of the study. 3. Provide information about their symptoms and medical history related to CTS. This study aims to improve diagnosis accuracy and explore whether ultrasound could be a more comfortable and quicker alternative to NCS for detecting CTS.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06926777
Lead Sponsor Combined Military Hospital Kohat Pakistan
Conditions Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Nerve Conduction, Ultrasound
Enrollment 50 participants
Start Date 2025-05-01
Primary Completion 2025-07-01 (estimated)
Study Completion 2025-07-01 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-04-15