Clinical Trial

Comparing Reticulocyte Hemoglobin and Transferrin Saturation to Guide Iron Treatment in People on Dialysis

Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated April 4, 2025 (before its estimated August 31, 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out which method is better for guiding iron treatment in adult patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis who have anemia. The main questions it aims to answer are: Can using reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent (RET-He) to guide intravenous (IV) iron treatment be as effective as using transferrin saturation (TSAT)? Does the method used to guide iron treatment affect outcomes such as death, heart problems, hospitalizations, infections, or the need for blood transfusions? Researchers will compare RET-He-guided iron treatment with TSAT-guided iron treatment to see if RET-He works just as well and has similar or better outcomes. Participants will: Receive IV iron based on either RET-He or TSAT levels Have blood tests done at the start, 3 months, and 6 months Have their doses of iron and erythropoietin (a medication to treat anemia) adjusted based on the assigned protocol Be monitored for clinical outcomes such as hospitalization, heart events, and infections
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2025-03-26.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06906835
Lead Sponsor King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Collaborators: Sysmex Asia Pacific, Chulalongkorn University
Conditions Hemodialysis, Anemia in End Stage Renal Disease
Enrollment 160 participants
Start Date 2025-01-31
Primary Completion 2025-08-31 (estimated)
Study Completion 2025-09-30 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-04-04