Clinical Trial

Effect of Colloids Versus Crystalloids on Heart Mechanics: a Double-blind Cross Over Randomized Trial

Enrolling by Invitation Phase 3
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated March 28, 2025 (before its estimated August 30, 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
The debate over whether to use colloid or crystalloid solutions for fluid resuscitationis still ongoing. Colloid solutions consist of large molecules that generally cannot pass through healthy capillary membranes, whereas crystalloid solutions contain ions that easily move from the intravascular space to the interstitial compartment. Therefore, it is traditionally argued that colloids are more effective at expanding intravascular volume, with a suggested ratio of 1:3 compared to crystalloids. However, there is currently limited evidence to suggest that resuscitation with one type of fluid is more effective or safer than t he other. Despite these theoretically advantageousphysiological properties, colloids have not demonstrated a clear hemodynamic benefit over crystalloids. We hypothesized that these unexpected discrepancies may be attributed to different mechanical heart responses.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06900972
Lead Sponsor University of Monastir
Conditions Fluid Reponsiveness, Fluid Resuscitation, Fluid Therapy
Enrollment 16 participants
Start Date 2025-04-01
Primary Completion 2025-08-30 (estimated)
Study Completion 2025-09-30 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-03-28