Clinical Trial

Comparing Effect of Opioid-sparing Versus Conventional Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery After Emergency Laparotomy

Study acronym: O-S Anesthesia
Not Yet Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated March 26, 2025 (before its estimated April 30, 2026 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
Aim of the Work The investigators aim to compare lidocaine-based anesthesia versus conventional anesthesia in the presence of multimodal analgesia protocol in terms of early quality of recovery and analgesic efficacy. Objectives To compare quality of recovery using the Quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score between lidocaine-based anesthesia in relation to conventional anesthesia in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Hypothesis the investigators hypothesize that lidocaine-based regimen would be effective in reducing opioid use and provide superior quality of recovery compared to conventional opioid-routine anesthesia in emergency laparotomy.
Protocol Amendment History 1 amendment
This ClinicalTrials.gov record has been amended once since 2025-03-17.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06889090
Lead Sponsor Cairo University
Conditions Anesthesia Recovery Period
Enrollment 120 participants
Start Date 2025-04-20
Primary Completion 2026-04-30 (estimated)
Study Completion 2026-05-12 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-03-26