Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two suction techniques during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for lower calyceal renal stones measuring 1.5-2 cm. The study evaluates Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus Antegrade Suction (via percutaneous access) in improving stone-free rates (SFR), reducing operative time, and minimizing complications such as bleeding, ureteral injury, and infection. A total of 120 adult patients will be randomized into two groups, undergoing either flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) or flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with antegrade suction, at Banha University Faculty of Medicine.

NCT Number	NCT06889051
Lead Sponsor	Benha University
Conditions	Nephrolithiasis, Urolithiasis, Endourology
Enrollment	120 participants
Start Date	2025-03-30
Primary Completion	2026-03-30 (estimated)
Study Completion	2026-03-30 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov	2025-03-21