Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT06857110 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.

Track this trial

"Supracondylar Radial Nerve Block Guided by Ultrasound Versus Hematoma Block for Analgesic Management in Closed Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures"

StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot applicable
Started
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Record status
This record was last updated March 17, 2025 (before its estimated March 31, 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.

Record History

See every version on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

  1. Minor Interventions: hematoma block (Procedure), ultrasound-guided supracondylar block of the radial nerve (Procedure) to 5 mg of intramuscular diclofenac (Drug), hematoma block (Procedure), ultrasound-guided supracondylar block of the radial nerve (Procedure)
    • Secondary endpoints: details revised at 1 of 8 entries
    • Study title shortened, about 5 words
    v2
  2. Minor Study First Submitted
  • Stopped: an ongoing trial was terminated, suspended or withdrawn.
  • Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
Non-surgical treatment with closed reduction and immobilization using a splint or cast is the preferred approach for stable distal radius fractures, particularly in elderly patients. It is also the initial intervention for displaced fractures with a surgical indication before the procedure, aiming to reduce edema, manage pain, and prevent associated complications. However, the maneuvers required for bone reduction can cause significant pain, and there is still insufficient evidence to favor one anesthetic method over another. In recent years, there has been a trend toward utilizing local methods, such as hematoma block or ultrasound-guided supracondylar block of the radial nerve, due to their lower incidence of complications. Nonetheless, there are currently no studies comparing the efficacy of these two analgesic approaches. This study aims to compare the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided supracondylar block with that obtained through hematoma block in patients with distal radius fracture during closed reduction, using the Numeric Rating Scale. Additionally, it aims to compare the quality of the reduction through radiographic measures and assess the frequency of adverse events after the two interventions.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06857110
Lead Sponsor Hospital Universitario San Ignacio
Collaborators: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Conditions
(from sponsor)
Distal Radius Fracture
Related terms Agnosia, Wrist Fractures
Enrollment 50 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov