Clinical Trial

Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Double J Stent Versus Percutaneous Feeding Tube Placement Following Open Pyeloplasty in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Single-center Study

Study acronym: DJS
Active, Not Recruiting
View on ClinicalTrials.gov →
Record status
This record was last updated February 26, 2025 (before its estimated July 10, 2025 completion). Its status may not reflect the trial's current state.
Summary
Open pyeloplasty is a common surgical intervention for pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Post-operative management strategies, including the use of a double J stent and a percutaneous feeding tube, vary widely. While both options have demonstrated effectiveness in drainage, their relative clinical outcomes, costs, and overall value in pediatric urology remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these two post-operative interventions in pediatric patients undergoing open pyeloplasty.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06847841
Lead Sponsor Hayat Abad Medical Complex, Peshawar
Conditions Pyeloplasty, Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care, Hospital Stay
Enrollment 140 participants
Start Date 2025-01-10
Primary Completion 2025-07-10 (estimated)
Study Completion 2025-07-10 (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov 2025-02-26