Track this trial free. DataLookout checks ClinicalTrials.gov daily and emails you which fields changed on NCT06744985 (status, enrollment, completion dates, endpoints, sites) when this record is updated. Free accounts track up to 5 trials.

Track this trial

Comparison of RTS and MGAP Scores in Predicting Outcomes of Trauma Patients

Study acronym: RTS-MGAP
StatusRecruiting
PhaseNot specified
Started
View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Record History

See every version on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

  1. Notable Primary completion date: Dec 10, 2025 to Dec 10, 2026
    • Study completion date: Dec 20, 2025 to Dec 20, 2026
    v9
  2. Notable Primary completion date: May 10, 2025 to Dec 10, 2025
    • Study completion date: May 20, 2025 to Dec 20, 2025
    • Site contact updated
    v8
  3. Notable Trial status: Not Yet Recruiting to Recruiting
    • Start date changed from estimate of Apr 20, 2025 to Jan 20, 2025
    • Site details revised
    v7
  4. Minor Site contact updatedv6
  5. Notable Start date: Feb 20, 2025 to Apr 20, 2025
    • Primary completion date: Apr 10, 2025 to May 10, 2025
    • Study completion date: Apr 20, 2025 to May 20, 2025
    v5
Show 3 earlier versionsHide 3 earlier versions
  1. Minor Re-verified, no change to tracked fieldsv4
  2. Notable Start date: Jan 10, 2025 to Feb 20, 2025
    • Site contact updated
    v3
  3. Minor Start date: Dec 30, 2024 to Jan 10, 2025
    • Eligibility criteria shortened, about 35 words
    • Secondary endpoints: details revised at 3 of 3 entries
    • Site contact updated
    v2
  1. Minor Study First Submitted
  • Stopped: an ongoing trial was terminated, suspended or withdrawn.
  • Notable: the trial’s plan changed such as a big move in its timeline or size, a new primary endpoint, sponsor or phase, or recruiting opened or resumed.
  • Minor: routine progress and housekeeping, such as sites added or enrollment closed.
The goal of this prospective cohort study is to compare the predictive accuracy of the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and the MGAP score in determining clinical outcomes among multiple trauma patients hospitalized at a trauma center in Iraq. The main questions it aims to answer are: Which score, RTS or MGAP, provides a more accurate prediction of clinical outcomes, including mortality? Are there specific subgroups of trauma patients where one scoring system outperforms the other? Participants will: Be assessed using both the RTS and MGAP scores upon admission. Have their clinical outcomes, including mortality and other relevant indicators, monitored throughout their hospital stay.
Trial Details
NCT Number NCT06744985
Lead Sponsor Al-Nahrain University
Conditions
(from sponsor)
Multiple Trauma/Injuries
Related terms Multiple Trauma, Wounds and Injuries
Enrollment 200 participants
Start Date
Primary Completion (estimated)
Study Completion (estimated)
Updated on ClinicalTrials.gov